نویسندگان
چکیده
تحول نسلها یکی از محورهای مهم در جامعهشناسی سیاسی معاصر است که نقش تعیینکنندهای در فهم تغییرات رفتار سیاسی و الگوهای مشارکت عمومی دارد. نسل Z به عنوان جدیدترین نسل فعال در عرصه اجتماعی و سیاسی، دارای ویژگیهای متمایزی در حوزه فرهنگ سیاسی است. این نسل بیش از آنکه به ایدئولوژیهای کلان سیاسی وفادار باشد، به مسائل عینی، عدالت اجتماعی، کارآمدی حکمرانی و کیفیت زندگی توجه دارد. هدف این مقاله تحلیل جامعهشناختی فرهنگ سیاسی نسل Z و تبیین عوامل مؤثر بر تحول آن است. روش پژوهش از نوع توصیفی-تحلیلی و مبتنی بر چارچوب نظری فرهنگ سیاسی، نظریه نسلها و نظریه تغییر ارزشها است. پرسش اصلی پژوهش این است که: فرهنگ سیاسی نسل Z چه ویژگیهایی دارد و چگونه از نسلهای پیشین متمایز میشود؟
یافتههای پژوهش نشان میدهد که نسل Z دارای فرهنگ سیاسی مشارکتی-انتقادی، مسئلهمحور و عملکردگرا است و مشروعیت سیاسی را بیش از هر چیز بر اساس کارآمدی، عدالت و پاسخگویی ارزیابی میکند. این تحول میتواند پیامدهای مهمی برای آینده نظامهای سیاسی و الگوهای حکمرانی داشته باشد
Political Sociology of Generation Z: Transformation of the Political Culture of the New Generation
Sahar Sadat Sajadian
Abstract
Generational change is one of the key themes in contemporary political sociology and plays a decisive role in understanding shifts in political behavior and patterns of public participation. Generation Z, as the most recent socially and politically active cohort, exhibits distinctive characteristics in the field of political culture. This generation is less committed to grand political ideologies and instead places greater emphasis on concrete issues, social justice, governance efficiency, and quality of life. The aim of this article is to provide a sociological analysis of Generation Z’s political culture and to explain the factors contributing to its transformation. The research employs a descriptive-analytical method and is grounded in the theoretical frameworks of political culture theory, generational theory, and value change theory. The main research question is: What are the characteristics of Generation Z’s political culture, and how does it differ from previous generations? The findings indicate that Generation Z possesses a participatory-critical, issue-oriented, and performance-driven political culture, evaluating political legitimacy primarily based on efficiency, justice, and accountability. This transformation may have significant implications for the future of political systems and governance models.
Keywords: Generation Z, political culture, political sociology, generational change, political participation, political values.
منابع
1. بدیع، حسین؛ عباس زاده مرزبالی، مجید و قهرمان، میثم.(1397). فرهنگ سیاسی؛ یک بررسی مفهومی و نظری، فصلنامه سیاست، شماره 17.
2. قوام، عبدالعلی(1382)، سیاستهاي مقایسهاي، تهران: سمت.
3. قراگوزلو، محمد(1387). فکر دموکراسی سیاسی، تهران: موسسه انتشارات نگاه
4. عالم، عبدالرحمن، (1374). فهم فرهنگ سیاسی، فصلنامه سیاست خارجی، شماره4.
5. دوست محمدی، حسین؛ عباس زاده مرزبالی، محسن (1402)، زمینه ها و پیامدهای مشارکت نسل Z در تنش های سیاسی اجتماعی ایران )، پژوهش های سیاسی، دوره 19، شماره 1، پیاپی 73، صص 102-63
1. Almond, G. A., & Verba, S. (1963). *The civic culture: Political attitudes and democracy in five nations*. Princeton University Press.
2. Bauman, Z. (2000). *Liquid modernity*. Polity Press.
3. Bauman, Z. (2000). *Liquid modernity*. Polity Press.
4. Beck, U., & Beck-Gernsheim, E. (2002). *Individualization: Institutionalized individualism and its social and political consequences*. Sage Publications.
5. Beck, U., & Beck-Gernsheim, E. (2002). *Individualization: Institutionalized individualism and its social and political consequences*. Sage Publications.
6. Bennett, W. L., & Segerberg, A. (2013). *The logic of connective action: Digital media and the personalization of contentious politics*. Cambridge University Press.
7. Castells, M. (2015). *Networks of outrage and hope: Social movements in the Internet age* (2nd ed.). Polity Press.
8. Castells, M. (2015). *Networks of outrage and hope: Social movements in the Internet age* (2nd ed.). Polity Press.
9. Dalton, R. J. (2020). *Citizen politics: Public opinion and political parties in advanced industrial democracies* (7th ed.). CQ Press.
10. Dalton, R. J. (2020). *Citizen politics: Public opinion and political parties in advanced industrial democracies* (7th ed.). CQ Press.
11. Dalton, R. J. (2021). *Citizen politics: Public opinion and political parties in advanced industrial democracies* (7th ed.). CQ Press.
12. Earl, J., & Kimport, K. (2011). *Digitally enabled social change: Activism in the Internet age*. MIT Press.
13. Fisher, D. R. (2018). The social psychology of climate change. In L. Steg & J. I. M. de Groot (Eds.), *Environmental psychology: An introduction* (2nd ed., pp. 123-132). Wiley-Blackwell.
14. Fisher, D. R. (2018). The social psychology of climate change. In L. Steg & J. I. M. de Groot (Eds.), *Environmental psychology: An introduction* (2nd ed., pp. 123-132). Wiley-Blackwell.
15. Fukuyama, F. (2013). *The origins of political order: From prehuman times to the French Revolution*. Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
16. Gerbaudo, P. (2012). *Tweets and the streets: Social media and contemporary activism*. Pluto Press.
17. Giddens, A. (1991). *Modernity and self-identity: Self and society in the late modern age*. Stanford University Press.
18. Giddens, A. (1991). *Modernity and self-identity: Self and society in the late modern age*. Stanford University Press.
19. Inglehart, R. (1997). *Modernization and postmodernization: Cultural, economic, and political change in 43 societies*. Princeton University Press.
20. Inglehart, R., & Norris, P. (2019). *Cultural backlash: Trump, Brexit, and authoritarian populism*. Cambridge University Press.
21. Inglehart, R., & Norris, P. (2019). *Cultural backlash: Trump, Brexit, and authoritarian populism*. Cambridge University Press.
22. Inglehart, R., & Welzel, C. (2005). *Modernization, cultural change, and democracy*. Cambridge University Press.
23. Kahne, J., Middaugh, E., & Allen, D. (2016). Youth, new media, and the rise of participatory politics. In D. Allen & J. S. Light (Eds.), *From voice to influence: Understanding citizenship in a digital age* (pp. 35-56). University of Chicago Press.
24. Kahne, J., Middaugh, E., & Allen, D. (2016). Youth, new media, and the rise of participatory politics. In D. Allen & J. S. Light (Eds.), *From voice to influence: Understanding citizenship in a digital age* (pp. 35-56). University of Chicago Press.
25. Loader, B. D., Vromen, A., & Xenos, M. A. (2016). The networked young citizen: Social media, political participation and civic engagement. In B. D. Loader, A. Vromen, & M. A. Xenos (Eds.), *The networked young citizen: Social media, political participation and civic engagement* (pp. 1-15). Routledge.
26. Loader, B. D., Vromen, A., & Xenos, M. A. (2016). The networked young citizen. In B. D. Loader, A. Vromen, & M. A. Xenos (Eds.), *The networked young citizen* (pp. 1-15). Routledge.
27. Lyotard, J. F. (1984). *The postmodern condition: A report on knowledge* (G. Bennington & B. Massumi, Trans.). University of Minnesota Press. (Original work published 1979)
28. Mannheim, K. (1952). *Essays on the sociology of knowledge*. Routledge & Kegan Paul.
29. Milan, S. (2015). From social movements to cloud protesting: The evolution of collective identity. *Information, Communication & Society, 18*(8), 887-900.
30. Mounk, Y. (2018). *The people vs. democracy: Why our freedom is in danger and how to save it*. Harvard University Press.
31. Mounk, Y. (2018). *The people vs. democracy: Why our freedom is in danger and how to save it*. Harvard University Press.
32. Norris, P. (2011). *Democratic deficit: Critical citizens revisited*. Cambridge University Press.
33. Norris, P. (2011). *Democratic deficit: Critical citizens revisited*. Cambridge University Press.
34. Norris, P. (2011). *Democratic deficit: Critical citizens revisited*. Cambridge University Press.
35. Norris, P., & Inglehart, R. (2019). *Cultural backlash: Trump, Brexit, and authoritarian populism*. Cambridge University Press.
36. Pariser, E. (2011). *The filter bubble: What the Internet is hiding from you*. Penguin Press.
37. Pew Research Center. (2020). *Millennials and Gen Z in the 2020 election*. Pew Research Center.
38. Pew Research Center. (2020). *Millennials and Gen Z in the 2020 election*. Pew Research Center.
39. Piketty, T. (2014). *Capital in the twenty-first century*. Harvard University Press.
40. Piketty, T. (2014). *Capital in the twenty-first century*. Harvard University Press.
41. Prensky, M. (2001). Digital natives, digital immigrants. *On the Horizon, 9*(5), 1-6.
42. Prensky, M. (2001). Digital natives, digital immigrants. *On the Horizon, 9*(5), 1-6.
43. Putnam, R. D. (2000). *Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community*. Simon & Schuster.
44. Rainie, L., & Wellman, B. (2012). *Networked: The new social operating system*. MIT Press.
45. Seemiller, C., & Grace, M. (2016). *Generation Z goes to college*. Jossey-Bass.
46. Smith, A., & Anderson, M. (2018). *Social media use in 2018*. Pew Research Center.
47. Smith, A., & Anderson, M. (2018). *Social media use in 2018*. Pew Research Center.
48. Theocharis, Y. (2021). The conceptualization and measurement of digital citizenship. In *The Routledge companion to media and citizenship* (pp. 89-102). Routledge.
49. Tufekci, Z. (2017). *Twitter and tear gas: The power and fragility of networked protest*. Yale University Press.
50. Tufekci, Z. (2017). *Twitter and tear gas: The power and fragility of networked protest*. Yale University Press.
51. Twenge, J. M. (2017). *iGen*. Atria Books.
52. Twenge, J. M. (2017). *iGen: Why today's super-connected kids are growing up less rebellious, more tolerant, less happy—and completely unprepared for adulthood—and what that means for the rest of us*. Atria Books.
53. Twenge, J. M. (2017). *iGen: Why today's super-connected kids are growing up less rebellious, more tolerant, less happy—and completely unprepared for adulthood*. Atria Books.
54. Weber, M. (1978). *Economy and society: An outline of interpretive sociology* (G. Roth & C. Wittich, Eds.). University of California Press. (Original work published 1922)
55. Wellman, B. (2002). Little boxes, glocalization, and networked individualism. In M. Tanabe, P. van den Besselaar, & T. Ishida (Eds.), *Digital cities II: Computational and sociological approaches* (pp. 11-25). Springer.
56. Welzel, C. (2013). *Freedom rising*. Cambridge University Press.
کلیدواژهها
